Assessing and improving the program
The survey results indicate a potential lack of introspection when it comes to the effectiveness of compliance training. Asked whether their company analyzes the impact on employee behavior of its compliance training program, just 26 percent say yes, 40 percent say no and around a third (34 percent) don’t know.
More respondents at larger companies say their firm conducts an analysis, with 32 percent of mega-caps and 29 percent of large caps doing so, compared with 23 percent at small caps and 24 percent at mid-caps.
The percentage of respondents who don’t know whether such analysis takes place also grows with company size, from 21 percent of those at small caps to 56 percent of those at mega-caps.
The number of respondents reporting that their company conducts an analysis is broadly consistent across the regions, at 27 percent of those in the US, a quarter (25 percent) of those in Europe and 22 percent of those in Canada. But there is much more awareness as to whether or not an analysis takes place among those in Europe, where just 18 percent don’t know, compared with 32 percent of those in Canada and almost half (44 percent) of those in the US.
Given this relative lack of analysis, it is perhaps not surprising that most (64 percent) respondents don’t know whether there is something that could help improve their company’s employee compliance training program. Around a fifth (21 percent) of all respondents say something could be done to improve their program and 15 percent say there isn’t anything.
Those at mid-cap companies are most likely (36 percent) to say something could be done to improve their program, compared with 19 percent of those at small caps, 16 percent at large caps and 8 percent at mega-caps. Respondents in Europe are slightly more likely (25 percent) to say there is an opportunity to improve their program than those in Canada (19 percent) or the US (16 percent).
Asked what could help improve their company’s employee compliance training program, respondents say:
‘Leadership by example and constant training’ – Africa, mid-cap
‘More digestible, less dense materials’ – US, mega-cap