On their agenda?
The level of attention stakeholder capitalism attracts in public discourse does not appear to have translated into it being a frequent topic of discussion in engagements with shareholders.
Respondents were asked to rate the frequency with which investors have in the past year asked about stakeholder capitalism issues affecting their company, using a scale of one to five, where one is ‘never’ and five is ‘very frequently’. Overall, the average score is 2, or ‘occasionally’. Respondents at mega-cap companies tend to report receiving the most frequent questions, with an average score of 2.4, or between ‘occasionally’ and ‘sometimes’.
Respondents at mid-cap and large-cap companies each give an average score of 1.7, compared with the 2.1 average score given by those at small caps. Those in Europe on average report more frequent investor questions (2.4) than their peers in North America (1.8).
Respondents were also asked to rate the importance of stakeholder capitalism issues to their investors using a scale of one to five, where one is ‘not at all important’ and five is ‘extremely important’.
Globally, the average score is 2.5. Respondents in Europe report a higher average score (2.8) than do their peers in North America (2.3).
Those at mega-caps report the highest average score (3.4) for the importance of stakeholder capitalism to investors. More than half (53 percent) say those issues are very or extremely important to their investors. Just under three in 10 respondents at mid-caps (29 percent) say the issues are very important. By contrast, almost half (48 percent) of respondents at large caps say stakeholder capitalism is not at all important to their investors.
Comments When asked what investors ask about stakeholder capitalism issues affecting their company, respondents’ comments include: